Capture One, Irident Developer, or Photo Ninja, on the other hand, will produce photographs that are nothing short of stunning when converted to RAW format from Fuji X images. Even though the a6000 has a full stop advantage over the X-T1, it has far worse color noise than either the X-T1 or your XA2 camera. I have the luxury of being patient, so it would be worthwhile to wait and see what the a6000 update will look like. I've severely restricted what I'm shooting right now, and the FZ1000 is perfectly enough for the vast majority of what I want to accomplish. I've had the Canon 5DM2, Canon 7D, Nikon D800, and Nikon D7100, all of which I considered to be excellent cameras.

The resolution is the same as a 4/3 system, which is lower than the a6000 or the Samsung NX1. Originally, I intended to sell my Sony a6000, but I found it more enjoyable to use than the Olympus OMD 5 M2. For the time being, I'm thinking about simply purchasing the Sony lens for when I need something wide and maybe acquiring a very nice prime for when I want to print a scene in its entirety. I use the lens for the few events and portraits that I may be able to capture in the future. There are seven custom settings available on the X-T1 that may be selected from the menu.

Typically, retail prices remain close to the launch price for the first few months, but after a few months, reductions become available. Further discounting and stock clearing discounts are commonplace later in the product cycle, and particularly when the successor model is ready to be introduced. As a result, the camera price is often reduced by a significant amount. Then, once the new model is introduced, extremely attractive prices on previously owned vehicles may regularly be obtained on the used market. If the front view area of the cameras is used as an aggregate indication of their size, the Sony A6000 is much smaller than the Fujifilm X-T1 in terms of physical dimensions. When comparing the two cameras, it's important to note that the X-T1 is splash and dust resistant, whilst the A6000 does not have any weather sealing.

Additionally, third-party manufacturers like as Samyang and Zeiss have developed lenses for the X-mount system. As a result of Fujifilm's reputation for high-quality optics, the company's lenses may be extremely pricey. I've found that using the smile mode is less successful — it may take the camera up to 2-5 seconds to recognize that my subject is smiling, and it can also fail to respond completely.

Fuji seems to have a pretty nice assortment of lenses, which is what first drew my interest to the company. I'm finding that I'm becoming less and less interested in switching lenses, so the a6000 with the lens and the Panasonic FZ1000 will be plenty for holidays. I will most likely purchase one or two prime lenses for those occasions when I want the fastest possible lens speed as well as the highest possible resolution. I realize that we often come to this conclusion at the end of our comparisons, but the fact is that both the a6000 and the X-T1 are absolutely acceptable solutions. They provide the function of a decent camera by generating high-quality photographs that may be seen on a screen, shared online, printed, or utilized for business projects and other purposes.

With Zone AF, you may pick a set of AF points, but with Wide/Tracking, the camera will automatically find the optimal AF point for the situation at hand. When the camera is set to flexible spot, you have the option of selecting one of three different AF point sizes. Unfortunately, the four buttons on the control wheel cannot be programmed to directly adjust the AF point on the fly. If you want to move the point, you must first activate the Focus Area feature by pressing the center button on the control pad, and then move the point using the four buttons on the control wheel. To move the point, you must first hit the center button on the control pad.

Because visual quality is almost inconsequential, the decision between the two will ultimately come down to personal choice. To be sure, there are a few things that may entice you in one way or the other depending on your preferences. Because of the outstanding viewfinder and manual controls on the X-T1, it may appeal to individuals who want to forgo virtual menus and LCD displays. Similarly, the sophisticated movie mode on the a6000 makes it a compelling option for individuals who like both stills and video.

You have three options for high ISO noise reduction: Normal, Low, and Off. We strongly advocate turning it down to a low level or turning it completely off since the noise may be extremely obtrusive. I believe that the functions are badly organized and that some of them are incorrectly titled. Having said that, the camera will always return you to the point in the menu where you left off, regardless of whether you merely exit the menu to shoot or turn the camera off altogether.

There is no doubt that the Sony a6000 is the superior filmmaking machine of the two cameras in comparison. When compared to the X-T1, it creates a more clean file with reduced noise, aliasing, and moiré. When someone is gazing at you directly in the eyes, it has a tendency to lock upon the right eye.

How can one distinguish between the two cameras – the Fujifilm X-T1 and the Sony A6000 – and which one is superior? The comparative advantages of the two models are shown in the following table. A PC Sync connector, which allows the camera to operate professional strobe lights, would be appreciated by studio photographers who will use the Fujifilm X-T1 to capture their images. In particular, the X-T1 is distinguished by the presence of a microphone port, which is absent from the A6000.

With regard to the electronic viewfinder, the two cameras under examination are identical in that they each include one. It should be noted, however, that the sensor in the Fujifilm X-T1 has a far greater resolution than the sensor in the Sony A6000. The following table covers some of the other key characteristics of the Fujifilm X-T1 and Sony A6000, as well as analogous information for a number of other comparable cameras and lenses. DXO Mark provides accurate and consistent information on real sensor performance for a wide range of cameras. The physical sensor features and sensor quality results are summarized in the table below, and they are compared across a group of cameras that are comparable in design.

When we tested the applications, they worked well on our iPhone 5 and were simple to set up. Unlike the a6000, you will not be required to download crucial functions like as time-lapse through an app on your phone (it has a built-in intervalometer). The cherry on top is that the X-body T1's has a button on the front that allows you to rapidly switch between S, C, and M modes when needed. When dealing with subjects who are heading straight towards you, you may employ AF-C with a single point.